I was in my early twenties, and my brother was dead.
The first time I read about him, in a book about his death, was in the same issue as a cover story about a person who had been murdered.
I knew nothing about him at the time, so I assumed he was dead, but I also had no idea what it meant to write such a story.
A few years later, when I was a professor at a university in Sydney, I took a look at the newspaper that had published the story and, for the first time, I could see what it was.
I couldn’t believe my eyes.
I had no inkling what the story was about.
The headline was a quote from a newspaper article that had been published in February, 1959, on the same day as the killing.
“A man who was killed at his home in the city of Sydney, Australia, is thought to have been stabbed at least four times in the back.”
In the article, the newspaper said the man was found “barely alive” and was “suspected to have killed a family member”.
This was a shocking piece of news, as a family man who had lived in the Sydney area for 20 years had been stabbed to death, and no one seemed to be aware of his death.
I thought, Well, that’s weird.
That’s just one man killed, right?
I thought there was a chance he had been beaten to death.
But, as I read the article a few months later, I realised that this story was a bit of an anomaly.
It was a rare case where someone who was dead was murdered by a stranger, and that was exactly what happened.
It’s been five years since I first read the headline, and it’s still not as if I know much about the case.
I’d been working on a PhD project on domestic violence, and I had to learn the details of the murder from the police, the coroner, the family, and other witnesses.
In my head, I was still very much in disbelief that the story even made it to print.
I was so surprised when, in March, I found out that the newspaper had actually reported on the murder.
I think the article was really unusual for a couple of reasons.
First, it had been reported on a Sunday afternoon.
The police, as usual, were in a rush to get the story out to the world, and there was no real news in the newspaper about the story.
I can remember thinking to myself, “Why would they print this story on a Saturday?”
There were no news stories in the newspapers about the murder on Sunday afternoon, which made it a bit strange that the police were so busy that they were not even able to report the story to the public.
In the absence of any news stories, the police would have just gone through the usual process of interviewing everyone involved, which might have led them to believe the story as true.
And, secondly, I didn’t realise how rare this particular case was until a few years after it happened.
The story was in a newspaper that was in general circulation, so the police probably didn’t know what to make of the story before they reported it.
In the year since I was working on the dissertation, I had begun to realise that, while it was very uncommon for a murder to be reported on Sunday, it could happen to anybody at any time, and the media would be quick to report on such a case.
When I began writing a thesis on domestic abuse, I knew I wanted to explore the subject in a way that was as non-judgmental as possible, so it made sense that the murder of a man who worked at a bar on a Friday would be one of the topics that I would be writing about.
As a professor, I needed to know the facts behind the murder, and so I took on the task of reading the newspaper article.
I read it and I realised something was wrong.
Why did it take a murder for the police to take a look into the murder case?
The first thing that struck me was that the article quoted the victim’s father as saying that he’d had no contact with his son.
When I looked at the facts surrounding the killing, I couldn`t find a trace of his name or any mention of his son, or any evidence of any sort of relationship between them.
It seems that the man’s father had been living in a rural area, so he was not even aware that his son was dead or that the father had ever seen his son alive.
In addition, the father was never given any notice about his son`s death.
It appeared that, for all his knowledge of his deceased son, he had no way of knowing whether his son had died by a knife or by being strangled.
And that’s something that is very difficult to understand when you’re trying to understand why someone would murder someone.
What happened to